Style is Sound. Not Necessarily Brevity.

“…’tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow'? One tomorrow would suffice, but it's the other two that have made the thing immortal.”

E. B. White, guru of the written word, responds to a query of conciseness. He addresses the eternal conflict between precision and flourish. To add words, or not to add, that is the question. As voiceover artists, we know the importance of sound and resonance. Perhaps you will find the sentiment in this letter as lovely as I did. Just Sayin'.

E. B. White #2

Dear Mr. --

It comes down to the meaning of 'needless.' Often a word can be removed without destroying the structure of a sentence, but that does not necessarily mean that the word is needless or that the sentence has gained by its removal.

If you were to put a narrow construction on the word 'needless,' you would have to remove tens of thousands of words from Shakespeare, who seldom said anything in six words that could be said in twenty. Writing is not an exercise in excision; it's a journey into sound. How about 'tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow'? One tomorrow would suffice, but it's the other two that have made the thing immortal. 

Thank you, thank you, thank you for your letter.

Yrs,

E.B. White